ABSTRACT
RESUMO Objetivo Avaliar e caracterizar a qualidade da assistência oftalmológica ofertada em uma unidade de serviços ambulatoriais da Atenção Secundária do Sistema Único de Saúde na percepção dos usuários e/ou dos responsáveis por esses usuários. Métodos Foi realizado estudo seccional de prevalência analítica entre usuários assistidos no período de setembro de 2019 a março de 2020 em um dos seis serviços de assistência oftalmológica ofertado pelo Sistema Único de Saúde, no município de Vitória da Conquista (BA). Foram avaliadas as condições demográficas e socioeconômicas e a autopercepção da saúde. Também foram avaliadas as características e os níveis de qualidade da assistência à saúde oftalmológica. A coleta das informações ocorreu por meio de entrevista telefônica. Resultados Participaram do estudo 389 usuários e/ou responsáveis. Observaram-se elevados níveis de satisfação, considerando as perguntas que compõem o constructo do instrumento. Identificaram-se níveis de qualidade comprometidos em relação à liberdade de escolher seu prestador de cuidado ocular (154; 39,7%). Menores níveis de satisfação associaram-se com as variáveis sexo masculino (razão de chance de 1,66; IC95% 1,04-2,65; p=0,033) e raça autodeclada branca (razão de chance de 6,89; IC95% 4,00-11,86; p=0,000). Conclusão Os usuários relataram bons níveis de satisfação da assistência à saúde oftalmológica. Observaram-se maiores chances de menores níveis de satisfação entre homens e aqueles com raça autodeclarada branca.
ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate and characterize the quality of ophthalmic care offered in an outpatient service unit of the SUS secondary care according to the perception of users and/or those responsible for these users. Methods A cross-sectional study of analytical prevalence was carried out among users assisted from September 2019 to March 2020, in one of the six ophthalmic care services offered by the SUS, in the municipality of Vitória da Conquista (BA), Brazil. Demographic and socioeconomic conditions, as well as self-perception of health, were evaluated. The characteristics and quality levels of ophthalmic health care were also evaluated. Data collection took place through a telephone interview. Results A total of 389 users and/or guardians participated in the study. Participants reported high levels of satisfaction, considering the questions that make up the instrument's construct. Compromised quality levels were observed in relation to the freedom to choose their eye care provider (n=154; 39.7%). Lower levels of satisfaction were associated with the variables male gender (OR=1.66; 95%CI=1.04-2.65; p=0.033) and self-reported white race (OR=6.89; 95%CI=4, 00-11.86; p=0.000). Conclusion Users reported good levels of satisfaction with eye health care. There were greater chances of lower levels of satisfaction among men and among those with a self-reported white race.
ABSTRACT
Abstract This study evaluated the construct validity of the instrument Oral Health Literacy among diabetics. A probabilistic random sample of 239 diabetics from an infinite population answered the 10 items of the questionnaire. The structural validity was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis and goodness of fit, chi-square per degrees of freedom ratio (X2/df), comparative fit index (CFI), goodness-of-fit index (GFI), and root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA). Internal consistency was estimated by the average variance extracted (AVE) and composite reliability (CR). The scores were dichotomized with the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval as the cutoff point. The three-dimensional model presented good quality parameters (X2 /df = 2.459; CFI = 0.988; TLI = 0.981) and poor RMSEA (0.078). Internal consistency was adequate; AVE for the Access, Understand/appraise, and Apply subscales were 0.831, 0.981, and 0.954 and the CR for these subscales were 0.893, 0.962, and 0.822, respectively. Inadequate literacy ranged from 41.8 to 48.1%. The three-dimensional model identified (access, understand/appraise, and apply) showed structural validity, good internal consistency, and understandability.